Social Media Told Me It Was About Learning. The Readings Proved It.

 

I have held the same assumption about social media for years. It is a tool. Use it well and it serves you. Use it poorly and it wastes your time. Simple enough.

Then I sat down with this week's readings, and that assumption started to crack around the edges.


The Boundary Nobody Can Find Anymore

Greenhow and Lewin open with a provocation that I keep returning to: social media is not just changing how we learn, it is changing what we even mean by learning. The line between formal and informal has always been a little fuzzy, but social media has made it almost impossible to draw. When a doctoral student builds a critical part of their theoretical framework from a thread they stumbled across online at midnight, is that formal learning? Informal? Does the distinction even matter?

I think it still matters, but not in the way institutions want it to. The categories exist to protect systems, not learners. And increasingly, learners are operating outside both.


A Conversation That Stopped Me Mid-Thought

This week, I met someone new. She was sharp, curious, and clearly someone who invested seriously in her own growth. I noticed she was not on Instagram, which surprised me.

When I asked why, she said she had deleted her account four years ago. Not because she hated social media. Because the community she had built there had stopped feeding her. Everyone was performing. Sharing the polished version. Nobody was willing to talk about the hard stuff, the failed experiments, the pivots, the seasons where nothing was working. She did not want to spend her attention in a space like that, so she left and went looking for something better.

I could not stop thinking about Dabbagh and Kitsantas as she spoke. They describe personal learning environments as a natural bridge between formal and informal learning, built through self-regulation and intentional curation. My friend had built exactly that bridge without ever encountering the academic literature. She just knew what she needed and went after it. That is self-directed learning in its most honest form.


Why Most Online Spaces Never Become Communities

Clay Shirky has this idea that every webpage is a latent community. The infrastructure is there. The potential exists. But most spaces never cross the threshold into something real.

Reading that alongside Rainie and Wellman this week, I think I understand why. A community requires shared purpose, honest communication, and the kind of trust that only builds when people show up as they actually are. Most platforms optimize for engagement, not honesty. They reward the highlight reel. They surface the post that performs, not the one that tells the truth. And so the latent community stays latent, because the conditions for genuine exchange never quite materialize.

My friend's Instagram was a perfect example. Technically, it had everything a community needs: shared connections, regular communication, a common platform. But the culture never developed the depth that makes a community worth staying in. So she left.


What I Am Taking Forward

Rainie and Wellman's networked individualism reframes all of this in a way I find genuinely useful. People today are not embedded in one defining community. They are nodes in multiple overlapping networks, moving between them based on what each one actually offers. My friend was not rejecting community when she deleted her account. She was doing exactly what networked individuals do: evaluating where her attention was generating real value and redirecting it somewhere better.

That is the question I am sitting with now as I build out my own professional learning network. Not which platforms I should be on. Not how many followers I should have. But whether the communities I am joining are places where people are willing to be genuinely useful to each other.

That bar is harder to clear than just showing up. But I think it is the right one.


What has your experience been with online learning communities? Have you ever left one that was no longer serving your growth? I would love to hear about it in the comments.

Comments

  1. Appreciated your perspective about the readings and plns. I'm not much of a joiner but am in a few online communities and have been for a long time for a few of them. I always learn something, but often that is not why I went to those communities in the first place. There are several communities I've left due to the "shouting across one another" and where "communicating for maximum insult" were sort of the community norms. I also find there are spaces where I just don't feel like my effort is worth the time. We can all offer our perspectives and educate people. But like you say, people put themselves out there in very curated ways, but very rarely listen and get real. It's unfortunate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have been wondering the same thing lately. How can we create spaces for people to feel safe sharing not only their accomplishments, but struggles and failures as well?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for sharing this reflection! I really like your point that social media is not just a tool, but a space where the culture of participation matters. Your friend’s experience with Instagram is a strong example of how a platform can look like a community on the surface, but still fail to provide the trust, honesty, and meaningful exchange that make people want to stay.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How a Cold LinkedIn DM Found Me a Community Across the Atlantic

What I Actually Think About Professional Learning Environments