Designing With Intention: Why Social Media in Learning Needs More Than a Post

 

Designing With Intention: Why Social Media in Learning Needs More Than a Post

There is a version of social media integration in education that looks like this: a professor adds a Twitter hashtag to the syllabus, tells students to post their reflections online, and calls it connected learning. The tool is there. The instruction is there. But the design is not.

I have been thinking about this all week, partly because of the readings and partly because of the work I do every day designing AI learning experiences for faculty at FSU. The gap between using a social media tool and designing a learning experience around one is wider than most people realize, and closing that gap requires a kind of intentionality that does not happen by accident.

The Problem With Bolt-On Social Media

Zgheib and Dabbagh (2020) make a distinction that I keep returning to: social media learning activities, which they call SMLAs, are not the same as simply using social media in a course. A social media learning activity has a clear pedagogical purpose, an intended knowledge activity, and a design that scaffolds the learner toward a specific outcome. Adding a hashtag to a syllabus is not that. It is a gesture toward connectivity without the architecture to make it meaningful.

This matters because learners do not automatically know how to transfer their everyday social media habits into a learning context. The way someone engages with Instagram for personal expression is not the same as the way they need to engage with a professional community on LinkedIn to build a networked learning practice. The skills are related but not identical, and the leap between them requires intentional design support, not just platform access.

What Intentional Design Actually Looks Like

Dennen's framework for instructional design and development for social media lessons helps clarify what intentional design requires. It is not enough to select a tool and assign a task. The designer needs to consider what knowledge activities the tool supports, how those activities connect to the learning goals, what norms need to be established for the community to function, and how the learning will be assessed in a way that values the networked process rather than just the final product.

Gülbahar et al. (2017) extend this further in their work on social media toolkits for higher education. Their framework pushes designers to think about competencies before platforms, asking what skills and dispositions learners need to develop before deciding which tool will best support that development. That sequencing matters enormously. When institutions rush to adopt a platform without first clarifying the learning rationale, they tend to produce exactly the kind of bolt-on integration that generates compliance without learning.

Designing for the Space, Not Just the Content

What Pischetola et al. (2022) add to this conversation is a materialist perspective that I find genuinely useful. They argue that networked learning spaces are not neutral containers. The tools, the interfaces, the social norms, and the physical or digital environments in which learning happens all shape what kinds of knowing become possible. Designing for networked learning means designing the space itself, its rhythms, its relationships, its affordances and constraints, not just the content that gets deposited into it.

This resonates deeply with my experience running the AI Sparks pilot at FSU. When we designed the design sprint experience for faculty, we were not just selecting tools and assigning tasks. We were building a temporary learning community with its own norms, its own pace, and its own relational infrastructure. The Google Workspace tools we used were chosen because they supported the specific knowledge activities we needed, collaborative ideation, rapid prototyping, and reflective documentation, not because they were the most popular or the most familiar.

The Rationale Has to Come First

Salomon's (2016) point about educational rationale applies here with particular force. Social media tools are seductive because they are visible, measurable, and easy to point to as evidence of innovation. A hashtag generates data. A LinkedIn post generates impressions. A collaborative Framapad document shows activity. But none of that activity is learning unless it is designed with a clear sense of why this tool, for this learner, in service of this goal.

The most effective social media learning designs I have seen and built share a common characteristic: they start with a problem worth solving, identify the knowledge activity most likely to produce insight, and then select the tool that best scaffolds that activity for that particular community of learners. The tool is the last decision, not the first.

What This Means for Practice

If you are an instructional designer, a faculty developer, or an educator thinking about incorporating social media into your practice, the most important question you can ask is not which platform should I use. It is what do I want learners to be able to do, think, or know by the end of this experience, and what kind of networked activity best supports that outcome.

The platforms will keep changing. New tools will emerge. Familiar ones will evolve or disappear. What will not change is the need for design that starts with learning, stays grounded in community, and treats the technology as a means rather than an end. That is what it means to design with intention, and it is the thing that separates a meaningful social media learning experience from a post that disappears into the feed.

When you think about your own learning design context, what would it look like to design a social media learning activity from the rationale outward rather than the tool inward? I would love to hear how others are thinking about this.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How a Cold LinkedIn DM Found Me a Community Across the Atlantic

Think back to the moment you received a major life-changing update. For me, it was getting my PhD admission letter to the Instructional Systems and Learning Technologies (ISLT) program at Florida State University. Once the initial rush of excitement and celebration settled, a heavy, practical thought immediately took over: “How am I going to find my people?” Moving across the world to a new city, a new university, and a completely new culture is exhilarating, but it can also be profoundly isolating. We live in an era dominated by recommendation algorithms, but when you are looking for a genuine human community, waiting for an algorithm to serve it to you on a silver platter rarely works. So, I decided to bypass the algorithm entirely. Treating LinkedIn Like a Targeted Search Engine Instead of passively scrolling through my feed hoping to stumble across a connection, I treated LinkedIn like a highly specific, targeted search engine. I knew that names alone weren't enough to narrow d...
Read more

Social Media Told Me It Was About Learning. The Readings Proved It.

  I have held the same assumption about social media for years. It is a tool. Use it well and it serves you. Use it poorly and it wastes your time. Simple enough. Then I sat down with this week's readings, and that assumption started to crack around the edges. The Boundary Nobody Can Find Anymore Greenhow and Lewin open with a provocation that I keep returning to: social media is not just changing how we learn, it is changing what we even mean by learning. The line between formal and informal has always been a little fuzzy, but social media has made it almost impossible to draw. When a doctoral student builds a critical part of their theoretical framework from a thread they stumbled across online at midnight, is that formal learning? Informal? Does the distinction even matter? I think it still matters, but not in the way institutions want it to. The categories exist to protect systems, not learners. And increasingly, learners are operating outside both. A Conversation That ...
Read more

What I Actually Think About Professional Learning Environments

I have been in education long enough to know that the most valuable learning I have done rarely happened inside a classroom. It happened in conversations, in late-night rabbit holes that started with one question and ended somewhere entirely unexpected, and in feedback from people who had nothing to gain from being generous with their time. That is what a professional learning environment actually is, at its best. Not a platform. Not a structured program. Not a badge. A network of people and resources that pushes your thinking forward when no one is requiring you to grow. Coming into this PhD journey, I already had a version of that network. Years of working in K-12 education across Africa, building curriculum, leading production teams, and eventually founding a nonprofit taught me early that learning does not wait for institutional permission. You find the people doing interesting work, you pay close attention to how they think, and you contribute something back whenever you can. Tha...
Read more