The Internet Does Not Organize Itself: Tags, Algorithms, and the Hidden Architecture of Online Learning

There is a question I have been sitting with since I started this course: when someone learns something valuable from a YouTube video, a Reddit thread, or a hashtag they stumbled across at midnight, who deserves credit for that? The creator who made the content? The platform that surfaced it? The stranger who tagged it in a way that made it findable in the first place?

The more I sit with the readings this week, the more I think the answer is all three, and that the architecture holding it all together is something most learners never think about.

Knowledge Does Not Spread on Its Own

One of the things the podcast made viscerally clear is that the internet does not organize knowledge out of goodwill. It organizes it through systems, some designed by engineers, some built organically by users, and increasingly some generated by algorithms that none of us fully understand.

Folksonomies are a good starting point for thinking about this. The term sounds academic, but the idea is simple: when ordinary people tag content, they collectively build a vocabulary for how knowledge is found. Dennen, Bagdy, and Cates found that tagging practices in online learning environments vary widely in accuracy and approach, and that variation has real consequences. A poorly tagged resource disappears. A well-tagged one gets passed around, cited, and built upon. The person who chose the right words made a learning connection possible for someone they will never meet.

Hartley's work on library Instagram accounts shows the same dynamic at play in public-facing spaces. Hashtags like #LoveLibraries are not just marketing tools. They are wayfinding systems. They create nodes that learners and communities can cluster around, even when those communities are distributed across cities and time zones.

Algorithms Are Not Neutral

Here is where it gets more complicated. Bucher's work on the algorithmic imaginary stopped me because it named something I have felt but never fully articulated. People develop intuitions about how algorithms work, even when those intuitions are incomplete or wrong, and those intuitions shape behavior. Faculty I work with in the AI Sparks pilot regularly make decisions about what to post, when to post, and how to phrase things based on their mental model of what the algorithm rewards. Whether their model is accurate is almost beside the point. The behavior is already being shaped.

This matters for learning because algorithms do not just surface content neutrally. They amplify what already performs well, which tends to mean content that generates fast engagement rather than content that generates deep thinking. Flinterud's work on folklore and social media platforms makes a related point: the folk in the age of algorithms is not a community gathered around a fire sharing stories organically. It is a community being sorted, segmented, and served content based on signals that prioritize retention over reflection.

What the Podcast Got Right

I listened to the NotebookLM podcast with appropriate skepticism given the warnings about hallucinated details, but the overall arc it drew was useful. The throughline connecting folksonomies, hashtags, algorithms, and crowdsourcing is essentially a story about distributed sense-making. No single person or institution controls how knowledge moves across the internet. It is negotiated constantly, through the tags people choose, the content algorithms amplify, the communities that form around shared vocabularies, and the individuals who curate and redirect attention toward what actually matters.

That is both the promise and the risk. The same infrastructure that helped my new friend find a learning community worth staying in after she left Instagram is the infrastructure that surfaces misinformation with equal efficiency. The difference is not the technology. It is the intentionality of the people using it and the literacy they bring to understanding how the system actually works.

What This Means for Building Learning Communities

Coming back to my own work, this has practical implications. When I build learning experiences, whether for faculty at FSU or teachers across Africa through LearnScape, I am not just designing content. I am designing for findability, for community formation, and for the conditions under which knowledge can travel beyond the original audience.

That means thinking carefully about tagging and metadata, not as administrative chores but as pedagogical decisions. It means being honest about the role algorithms play in who sees what and designing around those constraints rather than pretending they do not exist. And it means taking seriously the insight that the best online learning communities are not built by platforms. They are built by people who show up consistently, tag thoughtfully, and trust that the knowledge they put into the network will find its way to someone who needs it.

The internet does not organize itself. But with the right intentions and a little understanding of how the architecture works, learners can organize it in ways that serve something worth serving.

How intentional are you about how you tag and share content online? Do you think about who might find it and how? Drop your thoughts!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How a Cold LinkedIn DM Found Me a Community Across the Atlantic

Think back to the moment you received a major life-changing update. For me, it was getting my PhD admission letter to the Instructional Systems and Learning Technologies (ISLT) program at Florida State University. Once the initial rush of excitement and celebration settled, a heavy, practical thought immediately took over: “How am I going to find my people?” Moving across the world to a new city, a new university, and a completely new culture is exhilarating, but it can also be profoundly isolating. We live in an era dominated by recommendation algorithms, but when you are looking for a genuine human community, waiting for an algorithm to serve it to you on a silver platter rarely works. So, I decided to bypass the algorithm entirely. Treating LinkedIn Like a Targeted Search Engine Instead of passively scrolling through my feed hoping to stumble across a connection, I treated LinkedIn like a highly specific, targeted search engine. I knew that names alone weren't enough to narrow d...
Read more

Social Media Told Me It Was About Learning. The Readings Proved It.

  I have held the same assumption about social media for years. It is a tool. Use it well and it serves you. Use it poorly and it wastes your time. Simple enough. Then I sat down with this week's readings, and that assumption started to crack around the edges. The Boundary Nobody Can Find Anymore Greenhow and Lewin open with a provocation that I keep returning to: social media is not just changing how we learn, it is changing what we even mean by learning. The line between formal and informal has always been a little fuzzy, but social media has made it almost impossible to draw. When a doctoral student builds a critical part of their theoretical framework from a thread they stumbled across online at midnight, is that formal learning? Informal? Does the distinction even matter? I think it still matters, but not in the way institutions want it to. The categories exist to protect systems, not learners. And increasingly, learners are operating outside both. A Conversation That ...
Read more

What I Actually Think About Professional Learning Environments

I have been in education long enough to know that the most valuable learning I have done rarely happened inside a classroom. It happened in conversations, in late-night rabbit holes that started with one question and ended somewhere entirely unexpected, and in feedback from people who had nothing to gain from being generous with their time. That is what a professional learning environment actually is, at its best. Not a platform. Not a structured program. Not a badge. A network of people and resources that pushes your thinking forward when no one is requiring you to grow. Coming into this PhD journey, I already had a version of that network. Years of working in K-12 education across Africa, building curriculum, leading production teams, and eventually founding a nonprofit taught me early that learning does not wait for institutional permission. You find the people doing interesting work, you pay close attention to how they think, and you contribute something back whenever you can. Tha...
Read more